PIAG x CEIA-40 Debate: This House believes that the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion on the Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change exposes a potential incompatibility between the enforcement of international investment guarantees and effective climate action.

The PIAG x CEIA-40 Debate will explore the implications of the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion on the obligations of states concerning climate change. This event aims to discuss the potential conflicts that may arise between enforcing international investment guarantees and pursuing effective climate action. Participants will engage in a critical examination of how legal frameworks can adapt to address the urgent challenges posed by climate change while ensuring investment protections. The debate will welcome diverse perspectives and encourage attendees to consider the intersection of international law, environmental policy, and investment strategies.